Showing posts with label Chris Christie. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chris Christie. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 14, 2014

In the News - Christie Bridge Scandal and Longer School Days



Unless you're living under a bridge, you've probably heard about Chris Christie and the George Washington Bridge scandal. Christie, the current governor of New Jersey and a GOP front-runner for the White House in 2016, has apologized for the closure of some lanes on the GWB last September after the release of internal emails and text messages implicated that the governor's aides engineered the plan possibly to punish a Democratic mayor who do not endorse Christie's reelection nomination. Christie not only apologized and accepted responsibility for the mischievous deeds of his underlings, he dismissed two top advisers. Christie also plans to address this most recent scandal during his State of the State address today.

In that same address, Christie plans to propose longer school days and lengthening the school calendar as a way to improve student outcomes and boost competitiveness. Honestly, I don't think that's the answer.

Until this year, I spent a fair amount of time in our schools (I still go in when I can) and I get to hear the regular goings on of school days from my children. I'm thinking shortening the school week would help them much more. I'm not a fan of Responsive Classroom and I'm not thrilled with the idea of Common Core Standards either. And if our financial situation were different, the husband I agree we would pull them out of public schools and place them in private schools immediately.

I don't believe the blame--if there is a need to assign blame--falls squarely on any group's shoulders. While too much emphasis is placed on morning meetings and character values, not enough emphasis is placed on academic excellence. One of my children has been bored with school since she started and the only enrichment they could offer her was more time in the Art classroom. The other, struggles with a slow processing speed, but was taken off her Individualized Education Plan because standardized testing showed her disability disappeared after three years--I didn't even know that was possible. And at the middle school level, one daughter complains that the core subjects are taught amongst such chaos and disruption that she can barely focus on her work; this is backed up by the fact that her homework grades remain excellent, but her classwork and test grades are much lower.


The above picture only addresses part of the issue. Teaching has morphed into something much more than it was when I was in school. Teachers are expected to be negotiators, nurses,and psychologists while maintaining order in a classroom of unruly students who lack self-control and respect for authority. On another side, we have parents who hold the teachers more accountable for their children's performance than the children themselves. And another piece of the pie is reserved for all those do-gooders who think more money, smaller class sizes, and teaching kids to respect and compliment each other will fix everything.

If our school district went to longer school days or lengthened the school calendar, I feel our family would have to bite the monetary bullet and send the girls to private school regardless of the other cutbacks that would become necessary. More public school time is not the answer.

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

WSJ Wednesday - Four More Years



Our copy of The Wall Street Journal is at work with the hubby right now, but the front page of today's paper--like all papers--is talking about the re-election of President Barack Obama. I'll admit to being disappointed, but not surprised.

I haven't talked much about politics here, though I'm fairly certain most people know which way I lean. One thing I saw in the WSJ article by Peter Nicholas and Carole E. Lee caught my eye: "Propelling Mr. Obama to victory was the unique coalition he forged four years ago, one that reflects the changing nature of the U.S. electorate—notably, the diminished influence of white Americans and the rising clout of Latino voters." The article went on to cite certain statistics: "According to exit polls, Mr. Romney won 60% of the white vote. Mr. Obama won 38%, five points less than his 2008 showing. Not since Walter Mondale, who was swept aside by Ronald Reagan in the 1984 presidential race, has a Democrat recorded a smaller share of the white vote."

While TV networks will spend the next several days discussing the players in this election cycle and offer their opinions on why it turned out the way it did--How much did that 47% comment truly hurt Romney? What impact did Hurricane Sandy have on the outcome of the election? Did New Jersey Governor Chris Christie's praise of President Obama's handling of recovery efforts in his area tip the scales in the president's favor?--the average person like you and me need to move forward and find ways to cope with the lack of jobs and rising costs of living.

Honestly, no matter who won this election, politics seems to come down to two people who are so far removed from the average person's life they couldn't hope to understand where we're coming from. Running for office--even local races--takes money. Candidates running for local offices where they are faced with opposition can spend thousands of dollars. Ask me. I know. That's part of why I haven't been hot to get back into it.

Hopefully for now, politics can take a back seat to helping residents of New York and New Jersey, who are preparing for a Nor'easter while still trying to return to normalcy after Hurricane Sandy.

What did you think of the outcome of the election? Disappointed? Surprised?